Search for: "Articulated Technologies, LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 7:47 am by Jillian A. Centanni
., the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion concerning the willful infringement standard articulated in In re Seagate Technology, LLC (“Seagate”). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:41 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The restrictive covenant was contained in an operating agreement for Mattern & Associates, a consulting firm that provided technology services to law firms. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:51 am by Peter Mahler
 PFT Technology LLC v Wieser, Short Form Order, Index No. 8679/12 [Sup Ct Nassau County Feb. 20, 2014]. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:42 am by Lauren Ellerman
Dominion Technology Partners, LLC (2003) explained: We have long recognized that under the common law an employee, including an employee-at-will, owes a fiduciary duty of loyalty to his employer during his employment. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 6:55 am by Docket Navigator
[A]t the most, Enfish and subsequent cases suggest 'that there is considerable overlap between step one and step two,' but that 'whether the more detailed analysis is undertaken at step one or at step two, the analysis presumably would be based on a generally-accepted and understood definition of, or test for, what an 'abstract idea' encompasses.'" Rothschild Location Technologies LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 7,582,051 (Heart Failure Technologies,LLC v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Helen Kim
  The Silver Technology Working Group (“SNWG”) of the Silver Research Consortium LLC recently sent a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) expressing concern about a proposed interpretation issued by the EPA’s Office of Pesticide Programs (“OPP”) of a nanoscale pesticide products regulation under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”), 7 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 10:00 pm
Currently, under the standard set out by the Federal Circuit in In re Seagate Technology LLC, an enhanced damages award under § 284 requires clear and convincing evidence that: (1) the infringer acted despite an objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of a valid patent, and (2) that this objectively-defined risk was either known or so obvious that it should have been known to the accused infringer. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Note the law review article THREE HUNDRED NOS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 300+ DENIALS OF INSTITUTION FOR INTER PARTES AND COVERED BUSINESS METHOD PATENT REVIEWS PRIOR TO IN RE CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, 14 J. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., Nokia Corp., Nokia Inc., PNY Technologies, Inc., Research In Motion Ltd., Research in Motion Corporation, Transcend Information Inc., Transcend Information Inc. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:00 am by Brad Jenkins
"As a part of HSSK LLC, HSSK Forensics, Inc. developed and commercialized the Remlox remote acquisition technology as well as other technologies to improve the speed and efficiency of acquiring and processing electronically stored information," said Mike Hill, Sr., President of HSSK LLC. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 7:00 am by Brad Jenkins
"As a part of HSSK LLC, HSSK Forensics, Inc. developed and commercialized the Remlox remote acquisition technology as well as other technologies to improve the speed and efficiency of acquiring and processing electronically stored information," said Mike Hill, Sr., President of HSSK LLC. [read post]